Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Kolot_JewVoice: A Netzarim (an other Gush Katif abandonned community) Update - Please forward

A Netzarim (an other Gush Katif abandonned community) Update - Please forward
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Tuesday, 22 de November de 2005, 22:50
 Udi <udizinar@bigfoot.com> wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am back in Israel.
It was a long trip, but it was a very good one.  Great thanks for all of our friends and supporters who made that trip so fruitful.
The community is in the Negev at a trailer site at Yevul (a 50 family village in the south-western Negev). We are still missing our community facilities and there are no land-line phones as yet. There is hardly any bus service in the area thus our community members who held jobs in other towns have no means of getting to work.  We are currently in the process of setting up a shuttle-bus service from the community to a major road intersection where bus service is available.  For that purpose we will have to buy a bus ($100,000 - $150,000).  It is currently the most important project since it will grant many of our community members the opportunity to make a living.
During my last trip I have met with so many people who are not aware of the situation or do not want to believe what they hear about the situation.
Since we are LIVING the situation and since it IS a national issue (pushing 1800 families of hard working model citizens into poverty has a major impact on them, their friends and family, their past employees etc.) We at the Netzarim Development Fund have decided to take upon ourselves (it was not my idea, though...) to lead an investigation mission that will come to investigate the facts.
The idea is to set up a mission of community key people (Directors, Presidents, Rabbis etc.) who will come to Israel for a short period of time in order to investigate the situation.
Currently, I am in the process of setting up the mission.  The dates I have in mind are Dec 11th (leaving NYC) to Dec 16th(back in NYC).  I know it is the holiday season but those are the only dates available between Thanksgiving and Xmass.
My commitments to all of you is:
1. It will not be a political mission nor will it serve any political cause.
2. The mission will not serve just one community.  The mission will explore the situation amongst ALL of Gush Katif evacuees.
3. The mission will meet with representatives of the evacuees and with the evacuees at their current location (hotels, trailers, tents etc) and with representatives of SELA and the government.
4. This mission is not aimed towards supporting any specific vision - religious or secular.  We believe that the outcome of the disengagement plan is a national issue.  The people of Gush Katif were hard working model citizens.  Many of them provided jobs to many people.  Pushing them into poverty is bad for the economy of the state of Israel.
5. The goal of this mission is to raise awareness that will lead to involvement.  Many former Gush Katif residents are going to relocate to the Negev.  Inhabitating the Negev is a national mission.  We believe the involvement of Jewish communities from all over the world will expedite the process.
I believe it is very important to bring the facts to as many communities as possible.  This mission is aimed towards doing so.
I believe all Jews should get involved as this is a national issue: observant and non observant, Orthodox, Reform and Conservative - we should all get on board.
I believe the issue of Gush Katif made us all re-think.  If this re-thinking process leads to action - all Jews will benefit.
I believe this mission is important because it will create the involvement that will make the state of Israel stronger.
The mission is not sponsored.  I am currently working on the program.  The program and the cost will be ready by the end of the week.
Those who are willing to participate, please email your name, day and night tel #, city and state.  I will personally contact each and everyone of you.
Best regards,
Udi.
Ehud Zinar, Netzarim
Assistant to Chairman
USA:                            Israel
Tel: (1) 212 933-9537           Cell: (972) 54 6366-256
Fax: (1) 603 507-2444           Fax: (972) 3 684-4379
Email: netzarim_fund@bezeqint.net, udizinar@bigfoot.com

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Kolot_JewVoice: The case for Mitzpe Shalhevet

The case for Mitzpe Shalhevet
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Thursday, 17 November 2005, 03:45 PM
 Nov. 16, 2005 21:19 | Updated Nov. 17, 2005 0:48
The case for Mitzpe Shalhevet
By DAVID WILDER
posted by Michelle_Nevada <Michelle_Nevada@comcast.net>
to the group ChozrimExiles @YahooGroups

During the past several weeks, over 100 members of the Likud Central
Committee have come to Hebron to see, feel and experience the first Jewish
city in the Land of Israel. They've come mostly to view Jewish property that
is inaccessible to Hebron's Jewish community.

The story properly begins in 1807 when Haim Bajaio purchased, on behalf of
the Hebron Jewish community, a five-dunam plot of land adjacent to the
centuries-old Jewish Quarter, for 1,200 grushim. The deal was witnessed and
signed by no fewer than 22 Hebron Arab notables. This property served
Hebron's Jews and later accommodated the home and synagogue of its chief
rabbi, Eliahu Manni.

Following the Jordanian occupation of Hebron in 1948, the entire Jewish
Quarter - founded by Spanish-Jewish exiles in 1540 - was razed to the
ground. Among the structures destroyed was the ancient Avraham Avinu
Synagogue. In the early 1960s, an Arab fruit and vegetable market was
constructed on the property bought by the Hebron community in 1807.

Following the liberation of Hebron during the 1967 Six Day War, these
structures continued to function, having been rented to the Hebron Arab
municipality by the Israeli government. The property contracts for these
buildings expired in the 1990s, and the site was gradually closed over a
period of several years, due to security concerns. The market was finally
shut down following an attempted terrorist attack: Arabs placed a
booby-trapped teddy bear in a plastic bag in the market near the entrance to
the Jewish neighborhood, hoping a Jewish child, finding it, would play with
it and be killed in the ensuing explosion.

Despite numerous requests by our community to rent the structures, the site
has been left vacant.

On March 26, 2001, at the beginning of the Oslo War an Arab sniper shot and
killed 10-month-old Shalhevet Pass. Following the murder, Hebron children
began utilizing the abandoned Arab shuk as a place to play and take cover
during shooting attacks from the overlooking Abu Sneneh Hills. Over a period
of time, the Hebron community invested tens of thousands of dollars to
convert the former fruit and vegetable stalls into livable apartments.
Presently, the former market, renamed the Mitzpe Shalhevet neighborhood,
houses Hebron families and a Torah study hall opened in Shalhevet's memory.

Mitzpe Shalhevet is presently on the brink of obliteration, not by Arabs,
but by the government.

FOUR YEARS ago, in response to an Arab demand to reopen the market, the
Attorney-General's office notified the Supreme Court that: (1) the Arabs no
longer had any legal rights to the market and (2) that Israeli "trespassers"
would be evicted from the site.

The Supreme Court, however, never ruled that the former market's Jewish
population should be expelled from their homes.

The reason behind the attorney-general's decision is summed up in his own
words: "The criminal must not be rewarded."

The criminal, in this case, is not defined as the Arabs who murdered 67
Jews, destroyed the Jewish Quarter, shot at Hebron Jews from the surrounding hills and killed Shalhevet Pass. Rather, the criminal is defined as Hebron's Jews, who had "usurped" the vacant buildings belonging to the State of Israel.

Following issuance of an eviction order, Hebron's Jewish community appealed
to the courts, claiming private Jewish ownership of the property. An appeals
committee of three judges ruled 2-1 that the land did legally belong to a
private Jewish organization, but that the buildings legally fell within the
jurisdiction of the Israeli government. Concurrently, two of the three
judges ruled that the optimal solution to the problem was to lease the
structures to Hebron's Jewish community.

The defense minister delayed executing the eviction order for over two
years, due to security issues and other concerns. However, recently,
following the successful expulsion of 10,000 Jews from Gush Katif and
northern Samaria, the Attorney-General's Office has exerted tremendous
pressure on Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz to execute the eviction orders and
remove Hebron's families from the Mitzpe Shalhevet neighborhood.

Mofaz may be under the mistaken impression that the Supreme Court ruled that the structures must be evacuated. This is, as previously noted, not true. To the contrary, the easiest and most just solution, as recommended by the
judges, is to lease the buildings to Hebron's Jewish community.

On the Shabbat of November 26, thousands of Jews are expected to arrive in
Hebron to celebrate the annual Torah reading of Hayei Sarah commemorating
Abraham's purchase of Ma'arat Hamachpela, the Cave of the Patriarchs and
Matriarchs, some 4,000 years ago.

There could be no better way to affirm a permanent, eternal Jewish presence
in Hebron than to officially proclaim the reclamation and rededication of
Mitzpe Shalhevet. No doubt Abraham and Sarah would smile down upon us from the heavens above.

The writer is the spokesman of the Jewish Community of Hebron.

OrTorah: Sanhedrin Moves to Establish Council For Noahides

Sanhedrin Moves to Establish Council For Noahides
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Thursday, 17 November 2005, 02:30 PM
 
Sanhedrin Moves to Establish Council For Noahides
01:39 Sep 29, '05 / 25 Elul 5765
By Ezra HaLevi
taken from http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=90646


A council of non-Jewish observers of the Seven Laws of Noah has been selected and will be ordained by the reestablished Sanhedrin in Jerusalem this January.



B'nai Noach, literally "Children of Noah," known as Noahides, are non-Jews who take upon themselves the Torah's obligations for non-Jews - consisting of seven laws passed on from Noah following the flood, as documented in Genesis (see below).

Until now, Noahide communities and organization had been scattered around the globe, with a particular concentration centered around the southern United States. The communities themselves are a relatively recent phenomenon bolstered by the fact that the Internet has allowed individuals sharing Noahide beliefs to get in touch with one another.

The court of 71 rabbis, known as the Sanhedrin, which was reestablished last October in Tiberius following the reinstitution of rabbinic semikha, decided, after numerous requests from the Noahide community, to assist the movement in forming a leadership council.

Rabbi Michael Bar-Ron, with the Sanhedrin's blessing, travelled to the United States to meet with representatives of the Noahide movement and select members for the High Council. Bar-Ron, an ordained student, talmid samukh, who currently sits on the Sanhedrin, is also one of the Sanhedrin's spokesmen.

Bar-Ron organized a small conference in California where six of the council's future members were selected and also addressed the annual convention of the Vendyl Jones Research Institute - one of the Noahide organizations represented on the council. At the VJRI convention, Bar-Ron met five more of the Noahide leaders who will be joining the council.

The purpose of the council, which was the brainchild of Rabbi Avraham Toledano, is to assist the B'nei Noach in their struggle to observe the word of G-d. "The goal is to unify, serve and organize all kosher B'nei Noach communities of the world under a single body that can operate under the direct authority and supervision of the Sanhedrin," the decision to establish the body reads. "To form a vessel through which the Torah, from Zion (via the Sanhedrin) can effectively serve non-Jewish communities around the world."

A third goal of the creation of the High Council and the Sanhedrin's efforts in regard to the Noahide community, is to "transform the Noahide movement from a religious phenomenon - a curiosity many have not heard of - into a powerful international movement that can successfully compete with, and with G-d's help bring about the fall of, any religious movement but the pure authentic faith that was given to humanity through Noach, the father of us all," said emissary Bar-Ron.

To that end, one of the primary functions of the council will be the creation and development of effective outreach materials for the world. Although Judaism does not require or encourage non-Jews to become Jewish, the observance of the Seven Laws of Noah is incumbent upon humanity and widespread observance is to be worked toward, even through active proselytization, something that is anathema to Judaism.

The council is also seeking to identify and contact communities around the world who observe the Seven Laws of Noah in order to invite them to learn more about the movement. B'nei Noach in India and Brazil are already in touch with Noahide leaders.

Asked why the Sanhedrin would reach out to B'nei Noach before concentrating on outreach within the Jewish community, Rabbi Bar-Ron answered: "There was no conscious choice to ignore the issue of outreach toward other Jews, but there is a Torah principle that a mitzva, positive precept, that comes to your hand should be fulfilled first and should not be put off. It happens to be that the group that showed the most outward display of support and genuine concern for the success of the Sanhedrin - contacting us from the very outset - were the B'nei Noach. One of the great responsibilities of the Jewish people is to spread the laws of Noach."

Bar-Ron said he had mixed feelings as he departed for the meetings with the B'nei Noach leaders, as he left the day the forced expulsion of Jews from Gaza began. "I was in such a horrible heart-wrenching pain about leaving - I almost felt like a traitor to our people. But I realized then that although the government was detaching itself from the Land of Israel - a partial annulment of our covenant with G-d, similar to the sin of the ten spies - there is another aspect of the covenant that has not been pursued. That aspect is our obligation to be a nation of priests unto the nations. This is the core of the covenant with Abraham and it is something the Jewish people as a nation has not involved itself in since Second Temple times. So as the government disengaged from the covenant, I was participating in the reengagement with an aspect of the covenant that has been dormant."

Bar-Ron was very impressed with the B'nei Noach leaders he met. "Each of them had a different unique talent. One was an extremely talented media coordinator, two were great scholars of Noahide law, one was secretary of a large successful Noahide community and research institute and one was a law enforcement officer for a number of years. Each had the wisdom and experience that will help them lead the movement.

All of the prospective members of the High Council are obligated to appear in Jerusalem this coming January, at which time they will be ordained by the Sanhedrin as members of the High Council. "One of the things I thought would be more difficult was implementing the fact that the Sanhedrin's steering committee unanimously voted that the High Council members must appear personally before the Sanhedrin to be ordained as such," Bar-Ron said. "But the level of commitment of these people is so high that it is not posing a problem at all.

Each member was screened very carefully and accepted not only on the basis of their high reputation, wisdom and experience - there were many dedicated and talented B'nei Noach who we would have loved to have accepted into the council - but for their role as representatives of entire B'nei Noach communities or as experts in a particularly field.

The acting head of the Sanhedrin, Rabbi Yoel Schwartz, has set up a Beit Din for B'nei Noach to serve the needs of B'nei Noach worldwide. At this point, the council will not serve as a adjudicating body.

"It is our sincere hope that in years to come, the knowledge of the halakha, Torah law, of the Seven Laws of Noach will grow to such a degree that there will be true Noahide judges," Bar-Ron said. "One of the goals is to delineate clearly the seven laws and their applications according to the Mishneh Torah of the Rambam."

"Never before in recorded history have B'nei Noach come together to be ordained by the Sanhedrin for the purpose of spreading Noahide observance of laws," Bar-Ron said. "This is the first critical step of bringing about the ultimate flowering of the brotherhood of mankind envisioned by Noach, the father of mankind."

The Seven Laws of Noah are:

Shefichat damim - Do not murder.
Gezel - Do not steal or kidnap.
Avodah zarah - Do not worship false gods/idols.
Gilui arayot - Do not be sexually immoral (engage in incest, sodomy, bestiality, castration and adultery)
Birkat Hashem - Do not utter G-d's name in vain, curse G-d or pursue the occult.
Dinim - Set up righteous and honest courts and apply fair justice in judging offenders and uphold the principles of the last five.
Ever Min HaChai - Do not eat a part of a live animal.

For more information email the Sanhedrin's secretary at: dbtc@actco.com

Sunday, November 13, 2005

OrTorah: Finding Said to Boost Proof of Goliath

Finding Said to Boost Proof of Goliath
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Sunday, 13 November 2005, 02:44 AM
 
Finding Said to Boost Proof of Goliath

Associated Press
Thu Nov 10, 7:36 PM
www.comcast.net/news/science/index.jsp?cat=SCIENCE&fn=/2005/11/10/261812.html

JERUSALEM - Archaeologists digging at the purported
biblical home of Goliath have unearthed a shard of
pottery bearing an inscription of the Philistine's
name, a find they claimed lends historical credence to
the Bible's tale of David's battle with the giant.

While the discovery is not definitive evidence of
Goliath's existence, it does support the Bible's
depiction of life at the time the battle was supposed
to have occurred, said Dr. Aren Maeir, a professor at
Bar-Ilan University and director of the excavation.

"What this means is that at the time there were people
there named Goliath," he said. "It shows us that David
and Goliath's story reflects the cultural reality of
the time." In the story, David slew Goliath with a
slingshot.

Some scholars assert the story of David slaying the
giant Goliath is a myth written down hundreds of years
later. Maeir said finding the scraps lends historical
credence to the biblical story.

The shard dates back to around 950 B.C., within 70
years of when biblical chronology asserts David
squared off against Goliath, making it the oldest
Philistine inscription ever found, the archaeologists
said.

Scientists made the discovery at Tel es-Safi, a dig
site in southern Israel thought to be to be the
location of the Philistine city of Gath.


OrTorah: Kabbalah, Science and Creation -part I,

Kabbalah, Science and Creation -part I,
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Sunday, 13 November 2005, 02:38 AM
 
Kabbalah, Science and Creation -part I
By Nathan Aviezer
Jewish Action
Fall 5765/2004
posted to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HaTsafon/

In recent years, many religious scientists, I among
them, have written at length about the emerging
harmony between the discoveries of modern science and
the Torah account of Creation (1).  In particular, big
bang theory of cosmology provides a scientific
explanation (2,3) for every word and phrase that
appears in the first five verses of Bereishit - the
First Day of Creation.  In view of these remarkable
correlations between Torah and science, it is tempting
to explore the other traditional source that discusses
the creation of the universe, namely, kabbalah.

Kabbalah presents a description of Creation that is
very different from the description that appears in
the first chapter of Bereishit.  This does not imply
any contradiction between these two accounts of the
same event.  Rather, the two versions emphasize
different features.  The Torah description deals with
the actual sequence of events (First Day, Second Day,
et cetera), whereas kabbalah stresses the role of God
in the process of Creation and His interactions with
the universe.

Is it possible that the account of creation given by
kabbalah can be correlated with the findings of modern
science?  One might object to this question on the
grounds that kabbalah deals with the spiritual realm,
whereas science is restricted to the physical realm.
Nevertheless, one of the principles of kabbalah is
that the spiritual realm of the world above descends,
suitably garbed, to create a physical counterpart in
the world below.  Therefore, it is indeed in place to
ask:  Can one find features of the physical world that
appear related to kabbalah?  As we shall see, the
answer to this question is "yes."

In the past few decades, the physical universe has
been revealed to be a far richer, stranger and more
wonderful place than anyone could have imagined.  It
is precisely this subtlety and intricacy of the
physical world that provide the framework for the
various correlations with the spiritual world of
kabbalah.

Kabbalah

There are learned scholars who have spent their entire
lives studying the mysteries of kabbalah.  It is
therefore obvious that this essay will not contain a
comprehensive account of the subject.  For our
purposes, it is sufficient to concentrate on a few
basic principles.

It should be noted that there are different traditions
in kabbalah.  Our presentation will follow the ideas
of the Ari (Rav Isaac Luria, sixteenth century), whose
approach to kabbalah was foreshadowed in the writings
of earlier mukubalim (kabbalists).  The views of the
Ari were written down by his most important disciple,
Rav Chaim Vital (4).

One of the basic concepts in kabbalah is the sefirot.
The origin of the term has been understood in various
ways:  it is either sefirot, that is, "spheres," or
sapirim, relating to God's "radiating and sparkling,"
or mesaprim, alluding to the Divine cosmos "relating"
the glory of God.  The essence of God cannot be known;
we know of God only through His manifestations.
Central to His manifestations are the ten sefirot,
which represent Divine emanations or dimensions.  The
idea of exploring the ten sefirot is discussed in
Sefer Yetzirah 1:4:

Ten sefirot from nothingness.  Ten and not nine; ten
and not eleven.
Understand with wisdom; be wise with understanding.
Probe with them and explore with them.  Establish a
thing in its essence.
And return the Creator to His rightful place.

The Kabbalistic Account of Creation

Kabbalah characterizes God as the Ein-Sof ("without
end"), a limitless and unknowlable infinite realm.
The ten sefirot are configurations of Divine powers
within the Godhead, containing the principles whereby
God manifests Himself to us, and constituting the
vehicle through which God interacts with the universe.

In the beginning, the universe did not exist.  The
existence of an entity in addition to the Ein-Sof
would have been impossible, because this would
constitute a limitation on His infinity.  To enable
the universe to exist required an act of tzimtzum on
the part of God.  The literal meaning of tzimtzum is
"contraction," which the Ari understood as
"withdrawal."  Although the Midrash also speaks of the
presence of God undergoing tzimtzum, the idea there is
that His presence contracts and concentrates into a
point.  The Ari understood tzimtzum to mean a
contraction and withdrawing away from a point.  This
Divine withdrawal made possible the creative processes
leading to an entity - the universe - that could exist
in parallel with the Ein-Sof (5).

God's withdrawal provided a space into which flowed a
ray (kav) of Divine light.  The nature and development
of this light is dealt with in kabbalah literature.
What is relevant to our discussion is the effect of
the light on the sefirot or, more accurately, on the
vessels (kelim) associated with each of the ten
sefirot. 

The vessels of the first three sefirot managed to
contain the ray of light that flowed into them.
However, as the light struct the following seven
sefirot, it was too powerful to be held by their
vessels, which cracked and shattered, one after
another.  This kabbalistic concept is known as "the
breaking of the vessels" (shevirat haKelim).

In the future, through human fulfillment of Torah and
mitzvot, the seven broken sefirot may regain their
perfection, a process known as tikkun.  However, until
the era of tikkun, the universe will consist of three
intact and seven broken sefirot.

The Scientific Account of Creation

The branch of science that deals with the origin of
the universe is known as cosmology.  In every age and
in every culture, people would look up at the sky and
wonder:  What was the origin of the heavenly bodies -
the sun, the moon and the stars?  The concept of
Creation was considered an impossibility, because
science asserted that something cannot come from
nothing.  Therefore, scientists viewed the universe as
eternal, thus neatly avoiding its origins.  The
Bereishit statement that the universe was created
became an arena of conflict between science and Torah.
 That is how matters stood for many years.

But this situation has now changed.  The twentieth
century has witnessed an unprecedented explosion of
scientific knowledge that was nowhere more dramatic
than in cosmology.  Astronomers had been studying the
heavenly bodies for thousands of years, but their
studies dealt almost exclusively with charting the
paths of the stars, planets and comets, and
determining their composition, spectrum and other
properties.  The origin of the heavenly bodies
remained a complete mystery.  Important advances in
cosmology during the past few decades have, for the
first time, permitted scientists to construct a
coherent history of the origin of the universe.
Today, an overwhelming body of scientific evidence
supports the big bang theory of cosmology (6).

The current scientif status of the big bang theory was
summarized as follows:  "The big bang theory works
better than ever." (7)  Similar views were expressed
in 1999 by cosmology Brian Greene of Columbia
University:

"The modern theory of cosmic origins [asserts] that
the universe erupted from an enormously energetic
event . the big bang theory of creation is referred to
as the standard model of cosmology." (8)

The most important assertion of the big bang theory is
that the universe was literally created.  It is
instructive to quote some of the world's foremost
authorities.

Nobel laureate Paul Dirac, a major architect of
twentieth-century physics, writes: "It seems certain
that there was a definite time of creation." (9)
Leading cosmologist Stephen Hawking writes:  "The
creation lies outside the scope of the presently known
laws of physics." (10)

When cosmologists use the term "creation," to what are
they referring?  Precisely what object was created?
Scientists have discovered that the universe began
with the sudden appearance of an enormous ball of
light, called the "primeval light-ball."  This
"explosion of light" was dubbed the "big bang" by the
British astrophysicist, Fred Hoyle. (11)  The remnant
of this primeval light-ball was first detected in 1965
by two American physicists, Arno Penzias and Robert
Wilson, who were awarded the Nobel prize for physics
for their discovery.

Comparing Kabbalah with Science

Let us summarize the three features of the kabbalah
account of Creation:
1.  The universe began through an act of creation;
2. Divine light played a central role in the creation
and 
3. There exist three intact sefirot and seven broken
sefirot.  Our task is to relate these features of the
kabbalah account of Creation to the scientific theory
of the creation of the universe.

The first feature of the kabbalah account deals with
an event - the Creation.  Correspondingly, the big
bang theory of cosmology asserts that the universe was
indeed created.  Today, it is hardly possible to carry
on a meaningful discussion of cosmology without the
creation of the universe assuming a central role.

The second and third features of the kabbalah account
deal with entities - the Divine light and the ten
sefirot.  According to kabbalah, as stated previously,
every entity of the spiritual world above descends,
suitably garbed, into the physical realm of the world
below.  Therefore, the physical counterparts to the
Divine light and the ten sefirot are to be sought in
the world below.

The physical counterpart of the Divine light of
kabbalah is the primeval light of the big bang.  The
standard theory of cosmology asserts that the entity
that was created at the beginning of time was an
enormous ball of light, popularly known as the big
bang and hence, the name of the theory.  With
appropriate instrumentation, one can still observe the
remnant of this primeval light that dates back to the
very origins of time.

The difficulty resides in the third feature of the
kabbalah account of Creation.  What might be the
physical counterpart of the ten sefirot?  Since the
sefirot are often described as the "dimensions of
God," we propose that the physical counterpart of the
sefirot in the world below are the spatial dimensions
of the universe.   According to this proposal, the
three intact sefirot correspond to the three familiar
dimensions of space:  east-west, north-south, up-down.

This brings us to the crux of the problem:  The total
number of sefirot is ten.  Is there any sense in which
one can speak of a ten-dimensional universe?  And what
is meant by the broken sefirot?  Is there such a thing
as a broken dimension?

These questions are answered by string theory, (12)
the modern scientific description of the universe.
String theory asserts that the universe consists of
ten spatial dimensions. This discovery has generated a
great deal of excitement.  On the cover of a recent
scientific journal, the following words appeared:
"String Theory and Space-Time with Eleven Dimensions."
 (13, 14)  The eleven dimensions of space-time posited
by string theory consist of one time dimension and ten
spatial dimensions.

Of the ten spatial dimensions, three are the usual
dimensions previously mentioned (up-down, east-west,
north-south), while the other seven dimensions have
become "compacted" (in the language of string theory)
and, as a result, are not directly accessible to our
senses.  This is why it was previously thought that we
inhabit a universe of only three dimensions.

The importance of these amazing scientific statements
lies in the fact that they imply a correspondence
between science (string theory) and kabbalah.  One may
identify the physical counterpart of the seven broken
sefirot of kabbalah with the seven compacted
dimensions asserted by string theory.

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Kolot_JewVoice: We’re Being Robbed! - by Batya Medad

We’re Being Robbed! - by Batya Medad
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Wednesday, 9 November 2005, 01:55 PM
 We’re Being Robbed! by Batya Medad
Wednesday, November 9, 2005
posted to http://www.theraphi.com/medad/wbr.html

Just as we were trying to figure out which communities in Judea and Samaria are, G-d forbid, next in line for extinction and destruction, we were shocked to discover that Mount Zion, including David’s Tomb is being offered to the descendents of the Crusaders, the same guys who brought us the Inquisition more than half a millennium ago.

If you haven’t yet heard, and Israel’s President Katzav claims to be in the dark about this scandal, even though the government is planning on using him to sign the contract. Yes, I’m calling it a contract, rather than an agreement, since it’s a business deal involving millions, tens of millions of Euros, which are worth more than dollars. Honestly, it is possible that Katzav knows nothing about it. In Israel, the president is a figurehead to be wheeled out to smile and shake hands at formal occasions.

Katzav, a “traditional Jew,” keeps a kippah handy in his pocket for religious needs, and besides a ready smile, he seems pretty robotic to me. He succeeded Ezer Weitzman, his polar opposite in personality and life-style. That’s one of the reasons, probably the main reason he was elected.

It’s strange that even though Katzav’s office professes ignorance and the mainstream newspapers are at best playing it down and even worse most are ignoring it, a group of Anglos have had little trouble discovering the details. Sharon Katz’s Voices Magazine will be running an article on the subject.

Investigations have shown that the scheme was hatched by Avraham Poraz, of the anti-religious Shinui Party, when he was the Minister of the Interior. He promised to facilitate the deal during a visit to Rome over a year ago. The Shinui Party is no longer a member of the coalition. Previous Israeli officials, such as Rabbi Benny Elon of the National Union and former Minister of Tourism did everything to veto it.

The deal to give away Mount Zion to the Catholic Church has been totally ignored by the Hebrew press. Not even the religious Jewish papers have written about it. Every time I mention it to neighbors they are in shock and can’t figure out why they have been kept in the dark.

Not a peep has been heard from the politicians. It seems like all the activity is from some bloggers and emailers in English. From the amount of letters coming in to our computer, you’d think it was the biggest issue in the country, but unfortunately it’s not true. Nobody else seems to know anything.

I can’t believe that nobody cares.

Even if the area in question hadn’t been the location of a yeshiva, The Diaspora Yeshiva, for over thirty five years, it’s still of great religious and historical importance for the Jewish People. It shouldn’t be given, sold or leased to any other religion. It‘s a travesty of justice. Why are the civil rights of Jews always ignored?

On Friday I was the demonstration outside of the President’s Residence against his signing the agreement. We were a very small group, and only one politician showed, Jerusalem City Councilwoman, Mina Fenton. She seems to be the only person in the municipality showing any interest, and she had more information, and it was bad news.

It’s like living in the Theatre of the Absurd. Giving the Catholic Church such a holy Jewish Landmark endangers our existence.

Our disengaged government is out to destroy the country, G-d forbid. Let’s get to work. We have a country to save.

*****
Batya Medad, special to TheRaphi.com, and her husband made aliyah from New York in 1970 two months after their wedding. They have five children and two granddaughters and have lived in Shiloh since 1981. Batya hitchhikes to and from Beit El, where she teaches English in the Yeshiva High School B´nai Binyamin. Author's Website

OrTorah: The Convergence of Torah and Science

The Convergence of Torah and Science
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Wednesday, 9 November 2005, 01:42 PM
 The Convergence of Torah and Science*
by Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Wednesday, November 9, 2005
taken from http://www.theraphi.com/ppe/tcotas.html

Israel’s survival ultimately depends on national unity. Nothing is more conducive to unity than revealing the convergence of Torah and science. Hence the importance of Gerald L. Schroeder’s book, The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom. This essay is very much indebted to his work.

Dr. Schroeder, a physicist, writes: “Of all the ancient accounts of creation, only that of Genesis has warranted a second reading by the scientific community. It alone records a sequence of events that approaches the scientific account of our cosmic origin.”[1] Dr. Schroeder has especially in mind the Big Bang theory. Based on Einstein’s general theory of relativity, the abundance of evidence confirming the Big Bang has made creatio ex nihilo the reigning cosmological principle in the community of scientists. The dogma of the eternity of the universe, which held sway for millennia in philosophy and science as well as among eastern religions, has thus been discarded. In fact, more and more astronomers, astrophysicists, physicists, and mathematicians—hitherto atheists or agnostics—now admit that the universe, having had a Beginning, must have had a Beginner.

Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning God created (bara) the heavens and the earth …” contains a unique and seldom used word in the Torah, namely, bara. This word, translated as “created,” has as its primary definition “bringing into existence something that did not exist before.” In Genesis 1:1, bara means creation from nothing. Here “nothing” signifies the absence of matter and energy as well as the dimensions of space and time—hence nothing which any human being can detect and measure. The Big Bang theory therefore accords with the Genesis account of Creation. How did scientists arrive at the big bang?

When Einstein proposed his theory of general relativity in 1916, the cosmological doctrine of an eternal universe held in a static state throughout infinite time reigned supreme. Although his field equations predicted an expanding universe, Einstein was trying to construct a static model universe that would not collapse as a result of its own self-gravitation. But since Hubble’s discovery in 1929 of the recession of the galaxies, the theory of an expanding universe has dominated cosmology.[2] Knowing the rate at which the universe is expanding, one can extrapolate backwards to determine the size of the universe “in the beginning,” that is, at the moment when expansion began. At that moment, about 15 billion (Earth) years ago, the entire universe—all the galaxies, with their millions of stars, the dust and gas, the intergalactic matter, all the energy and even the four dimensions of space and time—was squeezed into an “atomic nucleus” or “singularity” of infinite or near infinite density, temperature, and pressure. That singularity, at which all known physics come to an end, was itself created (bara) from “nothing.” From that singularity, whose volume is very much smaller than the period at the end of this sentence, the universe burst forth and expanded, and it continues to expand. What an incredible and unintended confirmation, by science—indeed, by a Jew who was not even a believer—of the infinite power and majesty of God! Strange indeed are God’s ways. Strange too that estimates of the age of the universe from Jewish sources antedating the fifteenth century range from 2.5 to 17.5 billion years.[3]

Ponder, therefore, the words of the great Torah scholar and Kabalist Nahmanides (1194-1270). Commenting on Genesis 1:1 some seven hundred and fifty years ago, Nahmanides writes:

The Holy One, blessed be He, created all things from absolute non-existence. Now we have no expression in the sacred language for bringing [into existence] something from nothing other than the word bara (created). Everything that exists under the sun or above was not made from non-existence at the outset. Instead He brought forth from total and absolute nothing a very thin substance devoid of corporeality but having a power of potency, fit to assume form and to proceed from potentiality into reality. This was the primary matter created by God.[4]

 

This “primary matter” is nothing other than energy, which can be converted into matter (and vice versa) according to Einstein’s celebrated formula E=mc2. Commenting further on the first verse of Genesis, Nahmanides says, “with this creation, which was like a very small point having no substance, everything in the heavens and on the earth was created.” That point, of course is the previously mentioned “singularity” from which the Big Bang originated. Nahmanides derived this knowledge from the Talmud (ca. 500 CE). Physics has thus confirmed the first verse of Genesis, whose meaning was known 1,500 years ago by Rabbis who had received this secret knowledge via the oral tradition going back to the time of Moses. However, more fundamental than energy is wisdom: “With wisdom God created the heavens and the earth.” (See Proverbs 3:19.)

Since the reliability of the evidence confirming the Big Bang depends primarily on the accuracy of general relativity’s predictions about the dynamics of the universe, consider the following. General relativity predicts that, over time, two neutron stars orbiting about one another will radiate so much gravitational energy that they will spiral inward toward one another causing their orbital periods to speed up. With measurements extending over twenty years (1974-1994), general relativity was confirmed over all to an accuracy of no more than one part in a hundred trillion. This prompted physicist Roger Penrose to say, “This makes Einstein’s general relativity, in this particular sense, the most accurately tested theory known to science.”[5] In fact, no other theory of physics has ever been tested in so many different contexts and so rigorously; general relativity has withstood all these tests, which solidifies the Big Bang theory.

Given the infinite or near infinite temperature of the singularity which exploded in the Big Bang, one of the predicted consequences of this explosion is cosmic background radiation. The most compelling evidence of such radiation—which evidence showed how the galaxies were formed out of the Big Bang—was provided in the 1992 findings of the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite. Theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking (a reputed atheist) said, “It is the discovery of the century, if not of all time.” Astronomer George Smoot declared, “What we have found is evidence of the birth of the universe. It’s like looking at God.”[6]

Many other kinds of evidence confirming the Big Bang theory have been accumulated. Consider the Anthropic Principle, which has been elaborated during the last three decades, and which postulates a linkage between the structure of the universe and the prerequisites of human existence. The Anthropic Principle suggests a Creator-God concerned about man. Michael A. Corey writes:

The gravitational constant (G), for instance, appears to be exceedingly fine-tuned for the existence of life. If it were slightly larger, stars would have burned too hot and much too quickly to support the fragile needs of life; but if it were slightly smaller, the intrastellar process of nuclear fusion would have never initiated, and life would have been incapable of arising here.

This same rationale can also be applied to the expansion rate of the nascent universe … If the … expansion rate happened to be slightly greater than the presently observed value, life-supporting galaxies would have been unable to form; but if it were slightly smaller, the early universe would have collapsed back in on itself shortly after the Big Bang. Either way and no life forms would have been possible.

This is significant, because the various parameters that comprise the cosmic expansion rate [mass density of the universe, the explosive vigor of the Big Bang, and the strength of the gravitational constant] also had to be fine-tuned to better than one part in 1060 in order to generate a “flat” universe, so that normal Euclidian geometry (in which the sum of a triangle’s three angles add up to 180 degrees) could then become applicable. A similar degree of fine-tuning can be found throughout the remainder of nature’s fundamental parameters.

The challenge is to find a plausible explanation for this fine-tuning. According to the British mathematical physicist Roger Penrose, the odds that our biocentric universe could have accidentally evolved into its present fine-tuned configuration are an astounding one in 10 to the 10123, which is a number so vast that it couldn’t be written on a piece of paper the size of the entire visible universe. This is why many theorists have posited the existence of a “super-calculating intellect” to account for this fine-tuning.[7]

The fine-tuning of the universe includes dozens of parameters whose values must fall within narrowly defined ranges for physical life of any sort to exist. Mention may also be made of the ratio of the number of protons to electrons, the carbon to oxygen energy level ratio, the speed of light (299,792,458 kilometers per second), and the fine structure constant necessary for DNA to function.

Although the validity of the Anthropic Principle has been challenged by various scientists, its general formulation is consistent with the Torah, according to which the universe was created for man. Scientist and former skeptic Fred Hoyle concludes that “a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology.” Paul Davies has moved from promoting atheism to conceding, “It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the Universe. The impression of design is overwhelming.” No less than Stephen Hawking concedes: “It would be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in just this way, except as the act of a God who intended to create beings like us.”[8] But let us return to the big bang.

Since the Big Bang theory entails a finite universe, the question arises: What is there beyond? Outside the universe there is no space. The notion of emptiness, as opposed to fullness, applies only inside the universe. It bears repeating that space was created at the moment of the big bang. Hence there are no dimensions outside the universe (and of course the human mind reasons and calculates in terms of spatial dimensions). The same applies to time. The question of what went on before the big bang is meaningless, since time itself was created with that awesome event.

Leaving aside the two religions derived from Judaism, only the Torah unambiguously states that time is finite, that time has a beginning, and that God created time, as should now ring true from the Genesis account of Creation. Indeed, Dr. Schroeder, using Einstein’s equation for gravitational time dilation, shows that the duration and events of the billions of years which followed the big bang, and the events of the first six days of Genesis, are in fact one and the same!

Here are some relevant passages from his The Science of God. Schroeder suggests that we read the opening chapter of Genesis a few times, paying particular attention to the description of the events and the flow of time related to those events. Then read any other chapter in the entire Bible, again concentrating on the flow of events and the related flow of time. Note how the context changes. The description of time in the Bible is divided into two categories: the first six days and all the time thereafter.

During those six days, blocks of time are described and then we are told that a day passed. This is repeated in a totally objective fashion six times…. There is no intimate relation between the events and the passage of time.… Rather, we are told that the land and waters separated, plant life appeared, “And there was evening and there was morning a third day” (Gen. 1:9-13). No hint is given for the time each of these major events took.

With the appearance of humankind the accounting changes dramatically. The events now become the cause of the flow of time. Adam and Eve live 130 years and are the parents of Seth (Genesis 4:25; 5:3). Seth lived 105 years and is father to Enoch (Gen. 5:6). The passage of time is totally tied to the earthly events being described. These are indeed years of an earthly calendar.

Now here’s a puzzle. If, as th[e] ancient commentators claimed, the six days of Genesis are twenty-four-hour days, then why not include them in the calendar? Why not have the calendar start six days earlier? And why must these commentators tell me the days are twenty-four hours each? The Bible says “day.” I know a day takes twenty-four hours to pass. Why did they think I would think otherwise?

[Actually] … our questions were anticipated thousands of years ago. The six days are not included in the calendar because within those (six twenty-four-hour) days are all the secrets and ages of the universe. The confusion mounts. How can six days contain the ages of the universe? And if they are truly ages, then why refer to them as days?

The ancient realization that somehow the days of Genesis contained the generations of the cosmos is based on two biblical verses: “These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created in the day that the Eternal God made the earth and the heavens” (Gen. 2:4); and “This is the book of the generations of Adam in the day that God created Adam” (Gen. 5:1). In both verses, generations are juxtaposed to days [that is, to one day] of Genesis.

If the six twenty-four-hour days of Genesis were adequate to include all the days of the universe, the cosmic flow from the creation at the big bang to the creation of humankind, we clearly require an understanding of time that is not obvious to our unaided senses. Albert Einstein provided that understanding….

The law of relativity tells us that the flow of time at a location with high gravity or high velocity is actually slower than at a location with lower gravity or lower velocity. This means that the duration between ticks of a clock … in the high-G (or high-V) environment is actually longer than the duration between ticks on a clock … in the low-G (or low-V) environment. These differences in time’s passage are known as time dilation….[9]

 

After explaining the equality between the six days of Genesis and fifteen billion Earth years during which the entire universe was created, Dr. Schroeder refers to Nahmanides’ above quoted commentary on Genesis 1:1, and points out that the great Kabalist learned from his teachers that the first word of the Bible, beresheet— “In the beginning of”—means in the beginning of time. Biblical time thus begins with the appearance of matter—an extraordinary insight. Of course, it remained for the mathematics of general relativity to show how the six days of Creation recorded in Genesis is equal to fifteen billion (Earth) years.

It follows from the preceding discussion that the modern dichotomy between science and religion, or rather, between science and the Torah, has been placed in question by science itself. Indeed, a recent scientific article in one of the foremost international journals of physics bears the title, “Creation of the Universe from Nothing”:

At the 1990 meeting of the American Astronomical Society, Professor John Mather of Columbia University, an astrophysicist who also served on the staff of NASA’s Goddard Center, presented “the most dramatic support ever” for an open universe [i.e., one which supports a cosmological proof of God’s existence]. According to a journalist present, Mather’s keynote address was greeted with thunderous applause, which led the meeting’s chairman, Dr. Geoffrey Burbidge [an atheist astronomer], to comment: “It seems clear that the audience is in favor of the book of Genesis—at least the first verse or so, which seems to have been confirmed.”[10]

This is only the beginning!

Footnotes:

[1] Gerald L. Schroeder, The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom (New York: Broadway Books, 1997), p. 80.

[2] See Hugh Ross, The Creator and the Cosmos (Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 2001), pp. 24-25.

[3] See Aryeh Carmell & Cyril Domb, Challenge: Torah Views on Science and Its Problems (Jerusalem: Feldheim, 1976), p. 282, n. 10.

[4] Ramban (Nachmanides), Commentary on the Torah (5 vols.; New York: Shilo Publishing House, 1971). I, 23, Chavel trans.

[5] Cited in Ross, p. 104.

[6] Cited in ibid., p. 31.

[7] Extracted from the Internet.

[8] Quotes in this paragraph are cited in Ross, pp. 157, 159.

[9] Schroeder, pp. 45-47.

[10] Cited in Lawrence Kelemen, Permission to Believe: Four Rational Approaches to God’s Existence (Jerusalem: Targum/Feldheim, 1990), p. 40.

*(The Jerusalem Post recently published rather superficial articles regarding the relationship between science and religion. No mention was made of Dr. Gerald L. Schroeder’s illuminating work on the subject. Hence this essay, which is based on my latest book “A Jewish Philosophy of History.)

*****
Prof. Eidelberg, special to TheRaphi.com, is a political scientist, author and lecturer; co-founder and president of The Foundation For Constitutional Democracy and is the President of the Yamin Israel movement.

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Kolot_JewVoice: Mt. Zion Situation - Please Help

Mt. Zion Situation - Please Help
posted by shelomo@alfassa.com to the forum NetEsnoga@yahoogroups.com

Friends,

In October the Vatican paper 'El Messagero' reported Israel may sign
an agreement handing over part of Kever David HaMelech (the
traditional tomb of King David) on Mt. Zion to the Roman Catholic
Church. For many years the Vatican has wanted the room they describe
as the "Last Supper Room" of which all historians agree, is not the
location where a supposed event of the same name ever took place. In
exchange for handing this location over to the Church, the Jews
(Israel) would receive the Santa Maria La Blanca Church in Toledo,
Spain. Of course we all know there are no Jews left in Toledo after
being chased out in the 14th century with the violent pogroms.

We have come to learn that the President of Israel is not only
working to hand over part of the Mt. Zion Complex to the Church, but
the Church is going to build a Vatican annex or complex there. This
would be their first of more steps. We have assembled a great
international team and ISFSP is leading the charge to put pressure
(in a respectful way) to have President Katsav not sign this deal. He
is going to the Vatican in 2 weeks.

Please visit this website and learn more, see documents, and most of
all, HEAR a shocking interview with Rabbi Herman of Mt. Zion where
talks about what the Church plans to do with that portion of
Jerusalem--its shocking.

http://www.isfsp.org/zion.html

We need letter to the president, we need you to contact the media.

Shelomo

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Kolot_JewVoice: [Tsedakah] Appeal from Tsfat, Israel


Kolot_JewVoice: Project Warm Up-"Warming bodies...touching souls"

Project Warm Up-"Warming bodies...touching souls"
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Tuesday, 1 November 2005, 03:12 AM
 
Project Warm Up-"Warming bodies...touching souls"
posted to rammod@yahoogroups.com

A very good friend of mine from Jerusalem, Lori Lurie, has initiated a project to provide a new warm winter jacket for every person from Gush Katif and northern Shomron who was forced to leave their home. Lori has been able to get these jackets from the distributor at cost and has begun distributing them this week. The boys from Shevet Maalot will be coming around on Tuesday afternoon to collect for this worthwhile cause. Your donation of 36 shekels (twice "chai") will purchase a warm jacket. Please give generously. Contributions are tax deductible both here and in the US. If you prefer to bring the money directly to me you are welcome to do so. If anyone wants to pass this on to friends or relatives in chutz la'aretz, the address is

Project "Warm-Up"
P.O. Box 8431
Jerusalem 91084
projectwarmup@hotmail.com

Thank you and tizku lemitzvot,

Chevi Schrader
Hatirosh 14
If you have any questions you can call me at 9761290 or 054-6467739

Monday, October 31, 2005

Kolot_JewVoice: An Open Letter to American (Orthodox) Jewry

An Open Letter to American (Orthodox) Jewry
by EduPlanet Rectorate (daniEl I. Ginerman) - Monday, 31 de October de 2005, 19:52

Friday, October 28, 2005

"If it is crazy to be Jewish and to prefer Jewish law, then lock us all up in mental institutions"

After more than two months of media censorship and silence, the shameful story of the Israeli government prosecution and persecution of a 16-year-girl for her political and religious beliefs has broken through the media ban. The story of Tziviya Sariel of Elon Moreh finally hit the papers and her uncle was about to be interviewed on Israeli Channel 2, when an Israeli court issued a gag order against any publicity concerning her case.

Tziviya has been languishing in an Israeli jail for women, without bail for more than 60 days charged with involvment in anti government protests following the expulsion of Jews from Northern Shomron. She has angered the Israeli authorities by refusing to recognize the secular Israeli legal system, demanding to be tried before a Rabbinic court. This new trend of Jews demanding trials according to Torah law has caused absolute hysteria among many Israeli judges. The judge presiding over Tziviya's trial actually ordered Tziviyah to be sent for psychiatric evaluation because of her insistance to be tried in a Torah court.

The fact that Tziviya's case has now broken through government censorship has embarrassed the prosecutor and the courts to bring forward her next trial date to this coming Monday October 31, 05. Tziviya's family is urging the public to attend a protest outside the Kfar Saba courthouse, Monday 8:00 AM. The family will be holding signs that read: "If it is crazy to be Jewish and to prefer Jewish law, then lock us all up in mental institutions."

"The use of psychological repression against political rivals with opposing ideological beliefs is a tactic used by repressive regimes and has no place in the land of Israel. We hope to deliver thousands of signed petitions to the President of Israel against this insanity," said Yekutiel Ben Yaakov of Mishalot Yisrael.

To sign the petition visit http://www.voiceofjudea.com/eng/petition.asp

send contributions for campaign to Mishalot Yisrael - Jaffa Rd 210/14 Jerusalem, Israel


http://www.voiceofjudea.com

Mike - 0544876709